“Another Hollow OnLine Experience”






         

March 15, 2007

Beware the Ides of March

Filed under: newspeak, politics, social comment — 2:21 pm

These articles were brought to my attention.Martial Law called in Chinese Province

Great Britain wants to make sure children don’t step out of line. <– This is egregious Britain has instituted a new watch list for childcare professionals. The list indicates ways to gauge the developmental health of all GB children such as for new born to 11 months “the different ways babies communicate, such as gurgling when happy”.

A new law in France makes it a crime for anyone who is not a professional journalist to film real-world violence and distribute the images on the Internet - It’s citizens no longer have the right to show aggressive police behavior.

Ladies and gentlemen, I’m not happy with these developments and you shouldn’t be either.

Beware the Ides of March.

March 11, 2007

Oops, She Did it Again

Filed under: newspeak, politics, social comment — 9:29 pm

“All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.”
George Orwell, “Animal Farm”

“James Hall, the official in charge of the supposedly-voluntary scheme, said the Government would allow people to opt out - but in return they must “forgo the ability” to have a travel document.With one in every eight people saying they will refuse to sign-up, up to five million adults could effectively be refused permission to leave the country.

Campaigners reacted to Mr Hall’s remarks with fury, saying they were yet more evidence of the lurch towards “Big Brother” Britain.Phil Booth, of the NO2ID group, said: “The idea that ID cards scheme is voluntary, and people can opt-out, is a joke.”

FULL STORY- LINK


“I’m closer to the Golden Dawn
Immersed in Crowley’s uniform
Of imagery
I’m living in a silent film
Portraying
Himmler’s sacred realm
Of dream reality
I’m frightened by the total goal
Drawing to the ragged hole
And I ain’t got the power anymore
No I ain’t got the power anymore
I’m the twisted name
on Garbo’s eyes
Living proof of
Churchill’s lies
I’m destiny
I’m torn between the light and dark
Where others see their targets
Divine symmetry
Should I kiss the viper’s fang
Or herald loud
the death of Man
I’m sinking in the quicksand
of my thought
And I ain’t got the power anymore…”
David Bowie - “Quicksand

March 10, 2007

Washington Post article “The Nuclear Threat from China” by Mark Helprin

Filed under: politics, science — 1:47 pm

“In altering their position relative to that of the United States, the Chinese have received generous assistance from the past two American presidents, who have accomplished first a carefree diminution of our orders of battle and then the incompetent deployment of what was left, in a campaign analogous to losing a protracted struggle with Portugal. China advances and we decline because, among other things, its vision is disciplined and clear, while ours is burdened by fear, decadence and officials who understand neither Chinese grand strategy nor its nuclear component.

This has led the United States unwittingly to encourage China to move toward nuclear parity. In the next five years, as we reduce our arsenal from 10,000 strategic warheads to 1,700, China’s MIRV’d silo-based missiles and imminent generations of MIRV’d mobile and sea-based ICBMs will easily allow a breakout from warhead numbers now variously estimated to range from 80 to 1,800.

Once, the vast imbalance (in 1987, 500:1) might have discouraged China from such augmentation, but no longer. Our reductions and their growth provide fewer targets for more missiles and will create the possibility and therefore the temptation, however remote, of a first strike. As we have cut the stable sea-based leg of our nuclear deterrent from 37 ballistic missile submarines to 14, China works to build its own and a fleet that can provide protected bastions at sea as well as hunt down the small number of American boats on station.”

“Given China’s appetites and our alliances and interests, a war is not inconceivable in Taiwan, or in Korea. To remove American nuclear escalation from the equation, China would need not parity but only a deterrent such as it has long possessed. The Chinese, however, whose nuclear thresholds are dissimilar to ours, would have other options.

They know that every facet of America’s economy, military and society depends on individual and networked electronic devices. Were these to fail all at once and irreparably, the nation would seize up, perhaps for years.”

Full Story

« closer to the presentfurther in the past »
© 1979 - 2008