Part I-II of Glover’s TOE (Theory Of Everything)
Part I
Background
This is the boring part… The part you will probably skip…
I had that moment, that eureka moment in 1996. For years I had foregone anything normal in pursuit of unification. Most of my time was spent contemplating cause and effect. I think my grades will show I definitely wasn’t paying attention at school. I was, as I said before, occupied with understanding the universe and the world around me. I even would complain and try to warn people about the coming war with China (they and Russia are behind the attacks) but this was the nineties and no one wanted to hear it. I even remember discussing an idea I had. Commercial jets could, should and probably would be used as missiles. However my idea was a bit more complicated than hijacking.
Back to the story…
I searched and searched for clues that would help me to rectify Quantum and Newtonian physics. I would bounce ideas off of people whether they wanted to listen or not. My family was a great help in this as were a few people I would now consider friends. So there I was thinking and researching… spending blocks of hours on something that possibly and probably I would never figure out or be able to prove. Still the drive was there… an unhealthy obsession I can now see years later… I’m still trying to recover.
The moment came one day in ninety-six when I was riding in a car looking out the window. I was looking at the sky and the clouds. I looked at the clouds as they arranged themselves. It had hit me. It was so simple. I began to think of how it plays out. Everything I threw at it the theory accepted and had a place for. I didn’t completely trust the theory for weeks and still question it. It always works out correctly though. Anything you throw in the outcome was what you see in nature. It even predicted things that some of which have been discovered or accepted within the last ten years. Aside from physics it also fits chemistry, biology, and every other science.
An odd thing occurred afterwards. Something I didn’t expect. I had sought so long to find an answer so I could show everyone. I had wanted the Nobel Prize. I had wanted the world. I wanted the credit. Oddly though after discovering what I had, I no longer needed those things. The world had changed in my eyes. In an odd way I felt as if I had been to the top of the mountain and seen God. Or at least what God sees.
I later wrote a few physicists but my emails weren’t returned. I didn’t care.
What follows is a simple explanation of the Theory.
Part II
Hands of God (The Composition and Mechanics of Space)
Let me illustrate a simple model of the theory for you. Let me stress simple.
The Theory is based on a Hands of God particle or HoG particle.
HoG’s are what comprise the simplest level of the universe, Space.
HoG’s are also the smallest UNIT of energy within the universe.
HoG’s travel at great speeds giving space a balance.
So far in this model we have space void of matter. Space appears perfectly balanced.
Now we will introduce A Hydrogen-1 Atom.
What we see here is a Hydrogen-1 atom in this space. Space is now displaced by this atom. The atom acquires it’s attributes from the space around it, or more correctly from the HoG element around it.
Keep in mind this is a simplified cross section of HoG paths.
As matter displaces the HoG particles, the energy is differed around the matter giving the matter its attributes, structure, shape, and apparent energy level.
*At this point there maybe many questions and doors open. I will discuss those later.
Now let me take this a step further by adding another Hydrogen-1 atom.
Above we have space being displaced by two Hydrogen-1 atoms. What follows is an illustration of the effects of two or more amounts of matter within this model.
In this simplified cross section we see that between the two atoms there is less energy exertion. A shadow effect takes place. Either atom is shielding the other one from a small amount of HoG energy. What this creates is the appearance of attraction, or more accurately the appearance of gravity.
In this next illustration the lines will be replaced by a value. The numbers represent the force being exerted on the atom. Again the shadow effect can be seen.
Simply put 3 -1 = 2 = -1 + 3
The negative number being matter while the positive number indicates exertion.
Of course the actual numbers are astronomical.
Again this is a quick run down of an intregral part of the theory.
Part III to come…
7 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Perhaps you’re just being secretive…but it doesn’t look like it. Based on your descriptions.. it doesn’t seem that you have any idea about particle physics in a professional setting… it appears that you’ve had no education in the subject.. but that doesn’t mean you’re necessarily wrong… but based on what you posted so far… your information is baseless.. you provide no facts for your information… and your graphs reflect nothing of quantum theory…
once again… something is happening but you don’t know what it is.. do you… Mr. Jones?
pistprofit — August 26, 2006 @ 3:13 am
- Actually all that need to be done is prove the energy of space exists. Why it is there can come later.
it would seem that it would fail simply because you are assuming that your perception of time and space are correct.
- Heh. Most physics theories are based on new perceptions.
However you are operating in an infinite universe filled with infinite possibilities…
- Quantum Mechanic Voodoo. While it may be that we live in infinite space and there are infinite possiblities, it’s the immutable laws of nature that ensure there are finite outcomes.
Which is why string theory came about suggesting there may be hidden dimensions that are not exactly percieved by humans… That is not out of the realm of possibility…
- It is quite possible for there to be more demensions than the ones we perceive, length, width, height, and time. It certainly isn’t necessary though. Or do you mean alternate-universes? that is possible aswell but they would be bound by our laws. It’s relative afterall.
the universe as we understand it is full of energy we do not yet know how to perceive. Until Tesla..no one knew microwaves existed….
- LOL… I guess Maxwell and Hertz had nothing to do with it. Or do you mean microwave as what cooks your Easy Mac. Tesla was an engineer more than a physicist. Some of the energy you speak of would be space as I’m proposing. There is Material Energy and Spacial Energy. Material Energy that we have found thus far has been energy that follows the Natural Laws that we have deciphered. X-rays, Microwaves, etc… all exist within this realm of material. Can our human eye detect them? no. But we can translate them to frequencies we can see, hear, etc…
I’m kinda thinkin’ if you want your theory of everything to work… you’re going to have to account for these strange phenonmenon they’re finding in these particle smashers….. maybe your part III will give more answers… but remember that neither Einstein or Newton.. officially figured out what the fuck is going on with our universe…
- A theory of Everthing by definition has to explain the “strange phenomenon” that occurs in the “Atom Smashers” True, and they are both dead so I feel little competition from them now. But as the saying goes… I stand on the shoulders of Giants.
Perhaps you’re just being secretive…but it doesn’t look like it. Based on your descriptions.. it doesn’t seem that you have any idea about particle physics in a professional setting… it appears that you’ve had no education in the subject.. but that doesn’t mean you’re necessarily wrong…
- I’m not being secretive. I’m being simple, perhaps too simple. This, I’ve found, is the best way to begin to introduce people to the theory however. People tend to gloss over when you throw about up, down, charm, strange, top and bottom or even the above mentioned protium. This isn’t a professional setting so I felt no pressure to act as such. I assure I have had a great amount of education in the fields. As for being wrong, I would certainly question the coaching of someone who has never studied football.
but based on what you posted so far… your information is baseless.. you provide no facts for your information… and your graphs reflect nothing of quantum theory…
- True, no facts have been posted to support the theory yet. As for the graphs, I didn’t see a need to diagram Protium out for people as it is only meant to represent a unit of matter. Secondly that section is the introduction to a new explanation of Gravity thus the Newtonian overtones. It only foreshadows the sections to come. Oh, and by the way, I foget which “demention” the gravitons are leaking from. That’s a joke… or at least an attempt.
once again… something is happening but you don’t know what it is.. do you… Mr. Jones?
- I think you’ve been on maggie’s farm too long…
hollowex — August 27, 2006 @ 12:10 am
More dimensions than length, width, height, and time are certainly necessary to discover the true nature of the universe.. or so it would seem to me… these ideas do limit themselves. There have been plenty of geniuses working within these parameters whom only delivered a limited unstanding…. and no one is saying Maxwell and Hertz had nothing to do with our current understanding of physics.. just because their names weren’t mentioned… all physicists stand on the shoulders of giants.
My advice is simply to keep your explaination halfway between professional and layman.. no need to question the “coaching from someone who has never studied football.” I am speaking from the point of view of a non-physics/mathematical major. Which would seem is the same as yours… since it is fairly obvious you do not quite have “great amounts of education in the fields” as you claim.
if you have a wonderful new description of the nature of the universe that you can explain in a non-professional way, that’s great.. don’t pretend like you have a phd in the subject though. Not that you’re pretending to have a phd in it… but to claim “great amounts of education”… seems like a bit of a stretch… hehe..sorry to give you more shit.. but I like to provoke people who seem like they’re on the right track… not that I’m the best judge of that or anything..
sorry if i’m sounding like a dick or anything.. but you sound like one too.. perhaps it makes it a bit more fun that way
keep up the good work though.. you’re doing much more for the cause than I am.. I’m just patiently waiting for the next installment of your Theory of Everything… it’s some fun stuff.
pistprofit — September 25, 2006 @ 11:54 am
As for needing extra dimensions… What necessitates a need for more descriptors of our universe? What reality is required that our four dimensions can’t describe? And most importantly do we live in that reality or is it imaginary?
Maxwell and Hertz were only brought up because you declared that Tesla discovered microwaves. Your responses are pointing to a lack of reading comprehension skills on your part.
I’ve decided to go about explaining this theory in a new way as I’m very aware that my technical writing skills are the least of my talents. I’m thinking a video.
The PhD route I had decided against long ago… mostly for political and social reasons. However when I say that I have “great amounts of education in the fields” I am speaking of my nearly two decades now of study. I began studies in cosmology and history when I was roughly three or four years of age watching a lot of documentaries and the news along with having people read textbooks to me. I began in earnest studies in these fields at age seven… reading college level texts and watching any documentary I could get my hands on… In second grade I even did a report on Mesopotamia and the fertile crescent. One thing from that era that has stuck with me was my studies of Nazi Germany. I remember watching the news and every once in a while a Nazi would be found. During the news segment they would usually play footage of concentration camps. This led to learning about WWII. The fact that something of that magnitude had occurred only forty years earlier and that many of the actors and victims were still around underscores to a child the extremes that man is capable of experiencing. Ultimately science, history, and art have all been very important to me. They are the foundations that everything in man’s activity draw from.
Am I a dick? You wouldn’t be the first to call me that. But then again when one has the audacity to claim they understand something better than others being called a dick or asshole tend to be par for the course. As for saying you like to provoke people who seem like they are on the right track… I would advise that that is not the best way to achieve anything. “One catches more flies with honey” But then again I don’t for a second believe that you feel I’m on the right track.
hollowex — September 26, 2006 @ 9:50 pm
I would guess “extra” dimensions wouldn’t be “needed” if these 4 dimensions could explain the apparent nature of our universe. But they seem lacking… and indeed, I agree the most important question is…is our understanding real or imaginary?
I don’t lack the reading comprehension skills.. just lack the amount of reading materials….
Multi-media would be a good way to go… in order to educate ignorant minds like mine….
claiming something alternative to your idea is not the same as claiming superior understanding or education…
as far as saying you’re a dick.. that’s just in your tone. I don’t use it as an insult really, just a description of how you handle confrontation. To take on a condescending tone is a bit dick-ish… but it provokes alternative thought…
catering to what one already believes does not help them… making them question does… is your goal to “catch more flies with honey”?.. the fly undoubtedly does not want to be caught at all… so why use honey when your goal is to free them?
If I didn’t think you were on the right track.. I wouldn’t try to question you at all.. I wouldn’t waste any time here whatsoever…
But it seems you’re on a quest for Truth… so I try to add a little something to the discussion.. even if it’s very limited…it does provide you with something to respond against.. even if what I say is ignorant…it provides you with an opportunity to respond to the ignorant viewpoint… so perhaps someone can learn something from the discussion…
believe what you want about me thinking you’re on the right track.. that’s your choice…
pistprofit — October 1, 2006 @ 9:25 am
hollowex — October 3, 2006 @ 1:55 am
pistprofit — October 8, 2006 @ 9:21 am