A Continuing Discussion of Glover’s Theory of Everything (HoG p)

Email response to a friend on June 27th

It really clicked for me one day when I was looking at some clouds. Not that I accepted the idea immediately but I definitely had an”Oh my God” moment.

At the crux is the concept of natural stratification. Natural stratification is what creates the world we experience. It allows hydrogen and helium to be two completely separate nouns as opposed to just synonyms. We do understand the frequency (natural stratification) at which atomic structures find equilibrium and that has allowed us to predict elements that we haven’t yet seen. That is a major key. The problem I think many people have is that they view atoms like the models that are used in schools to illustrate them. You know the models, one blue sphere that represents a proton, one white sphere for the neutron, and a smaller red sphere for the electron hanging out like it’s a planet circling the center. People get lost in the idea that atoms look like that. The truth is though, it is simply a mathematical model that is helpful in discerning and illustrating energy strengths. In reality, the atom is a sphere of matter/energy (matter and energy being interchangeable).

When looking at an atom:

proton – neutron – electron

or

positive charge – neutral charge – negative charge

Clearly it’s evident why it was so simple to tie the forces electricity and magnetism together into the electromagnetic force.

The other forces however still have a hard time getting along though. nuclear weak, nuclear strong, and gravity.

Another important concept that is required for my “belief” is the concept of exponentiation. Exponentiation is what is used to tie the nuclear strong force and gravitation together. When looking at the two forces classically one cannot tie the two together because they do not share the same “power”. Gravity is the weakest force while nuclear strong is considered the strongest force. Physics’ “Standard Model” today tries to explain this away by creating particles for each force. (Sounds like a duct taped mess to me.)

So now we have matter, the current structure of the universe, and the rules of natural stratification and exponentiation. So how do we tie these together, what is the catalyst?

As crazy as it may sound and ultimately may be, I think the catalyst is something I’ve cheekily named the “Hand of God particle” or “HoG particle”.

The HoG particle is what I believe is the foundation of what we consider space or a vacuum. It could be viewed as a weave of moving points. Left alone (i.e. without matter) space is undetectable. Anything left on it’s own is limited in it’s description, Einstein understood that, thus he shared with the world the concept of relativity. Relativity is great and no one seems to understand it. So sad. It’s like the old philosophical question of the tree falling in the woods. Well, if it falls in the woods then yes it does make a sound because the woods were there to describe the tree (Observation extends beyond intelligence). If the tree falls in nothingness then no, nothing observed or described the tree.

So if we introduce matter into space how does matter describe space? That is what I looked at. Assuming space without matter is in perfect balance we can say it is in equilibrium. Once we add matter, space is no longer in equilibrium. What would this added matter look like if it were introduced as an imbalancer? What characteristics would it have? Matter would form into a sphere as space tried to reoccupy this displaced space much as a bubble in water does. What we’ve just described is the nuclear strong force. Matter added creates a sphere as it is held together.

So we have a point of matter. It is being crushed/held together by the exerted force of space seeking equilibrium. The mechanism I use is the HoG particle. The HoG particle is a tiny point of, for the lack of a better term, energy that zips through space. Space is filled with these points going to and fro. From where and where too? I don’t know. If I knew the reason I probably would have called them the Hand of Joe particles. j/k

So we’ve explained nuclear strong force but there is also a side effect called the electromagnetic force now.

As space interacts with matter, and creates the illusion of atomic bonding we can see the finger prints of space on our atom.

proton <- neutron <- electron <- space

Above is the channel in which the energy of space resonates through. Yes, I’m saying that electricity and magnetism are the results of space’s vibrant interaction with matter. Or more accurately electricity is the “excited liquid” state of matter while magnetism is simply the direction in which it flows. Nothing too controversial there actually. (Think wind on the surface of a pond)

So far we have:

the nuclear strong force being the outcome of displaced space (seeking equilibrium) creating the shape of matter

electricity is the outcome of HoG particles (space) bouncing on the surface of our point of matter

magnetism simply is the direction in which energy/matter is resonating/flowing

In order for nuclear weak and gravity to be described we now need to add another point(s) of matter, reference/observer.

So now we have two points of equal sized (massed) matter in our space. Both are undergoing the same state of spacial displacement.

Point (A) and Point (B) are identical except for location.

(A)———–distance ———–(B)

(A) is equally surrounded by space except for in the direction of where (B) is located.

Let’s for a moment remove (B) from our model and have (A) sit all by itself. Let’s say (A) is interacting with a million (completely arbitrary number) HoG particles every second.

Now, let’s put (B) back in the model.

(A) no longer is interacting with one million HoG’s now because (B) has been introduced thus blocking some of the interaction. Let’s say both (A) and (B) are now interacting with 999,999 HoG particles per second.

I call this the shadow effect. This is how I describe gravity.

Remember, space creates the sphere shape because it interacts equally on all sides of our material point. When two or more material points are present, space cannot interact equally on all sides.

Quick dirty and simple little model equation

Let’s give both points a displacement value of 1 (represented as -1)

(A-1) (B-1)

If spacial exertion (HoG particles) has a force of 5

5–> (A-1) <–5

Introduce (B)

5–> (A-1) <–4 4–>(B-1) <–5

Introduce (C)

5–> (A-1) <–3 4–>(B-1) <–4 3–> (C-1) <–5

Since an exertion of 5 is greater than 4 or 3 (A), (B), and (C) appear to be attracted to one another. Is the 5 force pushing? Or is the 4 and 3 forces pulling? The current belief is pulling, or gravity. Either answer is correct mathematically. We don’t want mathematical answers though, we want the truth. The truth is equilibrium. The only way for there to be the need for equilibrium is for space to need equilibrium. If there is actually “nothing” too space, then there would be little need for the attraction of matter on matter to exist. In fact matter would tend towards equilibrium and thus break apart. “Wait a minute!” you exclaim. “What about nuclear weak force? That is matter breaking apart!” True, I say. But we must look at that force through the lens of observation and not cold mathematics.

Not only do we have to deal with points (A), (B), and (C), but also points (1), (2), (3), and so on too numbers no one has the time to say.

This is how “Quantum physics” ties into “Newtonian physics”…

Traditionally the two seem to not add up, but if we take the line of reasoning that I’ve been laying out we can see how they do now add up as it were. We can do this by explaining nuclear weak, the decaying force.

Accepting what has been discussed, that “space” is exerting force upon matter due to matters’ displacing nature thus giving matter its attributes or description (nuclear strong, electromagnetic force), and that by adding two or more points of matter we can ferret out the image of gravity and understand how it appears; we can also, under this same observation see the mechanisms of nuclear decay (nuclear weak).

Let’s take the sun now as our new model. The sun is made up of many atoms (tiny points of matter). The atoms find different equilibrium as various elements (ah natural stratification, the amplified frequency of space’s interaction upon matter. The fingerprint of the Hand of God particles) ;) Well, in between those natural peaks are valleys. This same effect can be seen in piles of sand. Pour enough sand and the pile will shift until it finds a stable size. Pour too much, but not enough for it too collapse and it becomes unstable. Same principle can be applied to elements. Add too much matter without an allowance for new energy through-put and you get yourself an isotope (apparent anomaly), sometimes an unstable “pile” (nuclear weak force).

Let’s go back to the sun again and have a new look at it. Take in to account how many points make up the sun. Now take in to account how many points directly interact with “space”.

This is a problem involving surface area and displacement.

The sun clearly is over energized. Why is that? It’s because there isn’t enough surface area versus amount of displacement points (matter). If the suns material were dispersed (like a cloud) it wouldn’t appear as bright or energetic. But condense the material and you begin to see some strange things happen. At a certain limit of surface area versus points, space (HoG particles) can not directly interact with the interior of the system (stable unit). Because of this the “frequency” of interaction between HoGs and matter are resonated beyond the exterior of the sun into its interior. The exterior, in a way, becomes a force multiplier for space. Like gravity, the force I describe appears pathetically weak. But when you begin to add the effects of electromagnetic and nuclear weak forces to the mix and deprive the elements of their nuclear strong force you eventually get a soup of unstable material (sub-atomic particles). You also get fusion as the material undergoes natural stratification while seeking the path of least resistance towards equilibrium. Eventually enough material is expelled and the stars cool down.

Add all of these things up and you have yourself the structuring of an atom, a cloud, a solid body, a star system, a galaxy, a universe…